Avoiding and Defining Willfulness
U.S. taxpayers with unreported foreign accounts or assets are in a challenging position. The IRS has repeatedly announced that it is devoting resources to finding and penalizing taxpayers who do not disclose such offshore accounts and assets. In addition, many U.S. taxpayers, both domestic and international, are facing pressure from foreign banks to disclose their U.S. taxpayer status (via FATCA letters or W-9 forms) or close their accounts.
IRS Disclosure Programs
Most taxpayers and their representatives now are aware of the various programs allowing taxpayers to correct foreign reporting delinquencies. Starting in 2009, the IRS offered the Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program(“OVDP”) as a means for taxpayers to avoid criminal penalties and secure fixed terms when resolving civil liabilities. Under the OVDP, taxpayers are subject to a 27.5% penalty on the highest aggregate balance of their undisclosed accounts and must pay taxes on undisclosed income for the previous eight years with interest.
On July 1, 2014, the IRS created the Streamlined Disclosure Programs for taxpayers with non-willful failures to report foreign assets and accounts. Under these programs, taxpayers are only required to file three years of amended tax returns and six years of Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (“FBARs”). In addition, domestic taxpayers are subjected to a reduced penalty of 5% of the highest aggregate balance of their undisclosed accounts, while U.S. taxpayers living abroad are not subject to any penalties.
In our firm’s experience, we have seen fewer participants in the OVDP program over the last few years, however, the OVDP program remains a good option for certain taxpayers. Separately, we have seen significant interest and increased participation by taxpayers in the Streamline program.
The Importance of Willfulness
Because of their lower penalties and simplified reporting requirements, taxpayers often prefer to participate in Streamlined Disclosure Programs as opposed to the OVDP. The programs, however, come at a price: under penalties of perjury, taxpayers must certify that their conduct in failing to disclose their accounts or assets was non-willful.
To take advantage of these new procedures, individuals must demonstrate to the satisfaction of the IRS that their conduct was not “willful.” At the heart of the streamlined procedures, taxpayers must certify that their failure to report foreign financial assets and pay all tax due was not the result of willful conduct (click here for further details). A taxpayer must complete and execute a certification form, Certification by U.S. Person Residing in the United States for Streamlined Domestic Offshore Procedures.
The IRS advises that “Non-willful conduct is conduct that is due to negligence, inadvertence, or mistake or conduct that is the result of a good faith misunderstanding of the requirements of the law.” However, this definition does not address what willfulness is, it only uses vague terms to describe what it is not. The line between non-willfulness and willfulness remains unclear.
Over the last few months, informal remarks of an IRS representative and a recent federal court case have provided additional guidance on the meaning of “willfulness” for the streamlined programs. On October 21, 2016, John McDougal, a special trial attorney and division counsel for the IRS Small Business/Self-Employed Division, stated: “Anything that doesn’t rise to the level of tax fraud or the willfulness standard for [FBARs] is fair game for streamlining…As long as you weren’t fraudulent or willful in the FBAR sense…even gross negligence is an appropriate basis for filing streamlined.”
In addition, a recent case, United States v. Bohanec, No. 2:15-cv-4347 (C.D. Cal. Dec. 8, 2016), concludes that a “reckless disregard of a statutory duty” constitutes willfulness in the FBAR filing context. The taxpayers in Bohanec were naturalized citizens who operated a camera store in Pasadena, California. They deposited the store’s international sales commissions into a Swiss bank account, but failed to file tax returns or FBARs between 1998 and 2011. In 2010, they applied to participate in the OVDP disclosing the Swiss account, but even then failed to report additional foreign bank accounts in Mexico and Austria. Eventually they were rejected from the OVDP. The federal court held that these taxpayers were reasonably sophisticated business people who had recklessly disregarded a statutory duty regarding their reporting obligations for their foreign bank accounts. Therefore, they had “willfully” failed to file required FBARs and could be subject to increased penalties.
While Bohanec is not a Streamlined Disclosure Program case, it may help taxpayers who are unsure whether they qualify for these program. Bohanec says that a “reckless disregard of a statutory duty” is enough to be willful. So what, exactly, constitutes “reckless disregard of a statutory duty”? In Bohanec, the following facts showed the taxpayers were “at least recklessly indifferent to a statutory” duty: (1) the taxpayers were specifically asked about foreign bank accounts on tax returns but did not report them, (2) the taxpayers never provided their Swiss bank with their home address and never told anyone but their children about the account’s existence, (3) they failed to engage professional accounting help once they opened their Swiss bank account, (4) they operated a professional business (and were thus “reasonably sophisticated business people” who were aware of the duty to file and pay taxes), and (5) they were rejected from the OVDP for failure to disclose all foreign bank accounts.
The takeaway from recent IRS statements, as well as the Bohanec case appears to be the following: willfulness for the Streamlined Disclosure Programs falls somewhere between gross negligence and recklessness. Informal IRS guidance tells us that a willful failure to file FBARs requires more than gross negligence. Gross negligence is generally understood to refer to consciously and voluntarily not using reasonable care. But Bohanec may mean that reckless indifference to filing an FBAR is enough to be “willful” in the Streamlined Disclosure Program context.
Under Bohanec, a finding that the taxpayer is reasonably sophisticated could tip the balance to show “reckless disregard” of the obligation to file FBARs. Arguably, this could mean that such taxpayers do not qualify for the streamlined program. But consider a reasonably sophisticated taxpayer who simply failed to use reasonable care in filing FBARs; such a taxpayer may be only grossly negligent with respect to his FBAR reporting obligations, which would mean that he qualifies for the streamlined programs.
In short, the recent guidance on willfulness in the FBAR context may create as many questions as it answers for taxpayers hoping to meet the “non-willfulness” requirement of the Streamlined Disclosure Programs.
In our firm’s experience, we have seen great interest and increased participation by taxpayers in the Streamline program. Taxpayers who have failed to comply with their US tax filing and information reporting obligations should be aware of and seek appropriate advice regarding which disclosure program to pursue. Our firm presented an informational webinar on the Streamlined Filing Compliance Procedures. Materials from the webinar can be downloaded here: Game Changer Streamline.
Patel Law Offices has consulted with hundreds of clients regarding their offshore asset and income compliance issues. Patel Law Offices is a law firm dedicated to helping clients resolve complicated tax, criminal tax, and international tax problems. Our firm assists (and defends) clients and their advisors to legally disclose (and legitimize) foreign assets.