Tax, Estate Planning, Probate & Elder Law Center

Your Information source for tax, wills, trusts, offshore asset planning, estate tax minimization, powers of attorney, living wills, health care directives, special needs trusts, asset protection, charitable giving, guardianship, succession planning, retirement and estate administration.

Major changes to IRS offshore voluntary compliance programs

Many clients are asking our office about the new compliance solutions to clean up past errors in disclosing foreign assets.

In June 2014, the IRS announced major changes to its offshore voluntary compliance programs, providing new options to help taxpayers residing both overseas and in the United States. The changes are intended to give thousands of people a new avenue to comply with their U.S. tax obligations (IR-2014-73). Modifications were made in response to public comments that the existing program lacked a path to compliance for individuals whose failure to report offshore accounts was not willful.

Because taxpayers’ non-U.S. investments vary widely, the IRS offers the following options for addressing previous failures to comply with U.S. tax and information return obligations:

  1. The Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program (OVDP); Taxpayers whose conduct was likely willful are directed to the OVDP—where they pay a much higher 27.5% miscellaneous offshore penalty;
  2. A new non-willful certification program, referred to as the IRS Streamlined filing compliance procedures (SDOP and SFOP); Under this program, taxpayers residing in the United States whose failure to report foreign financial assets and pay all tax due on those assets was not the result of willful conduct are subject to only a 5% miscellaneous offshore penalty (non-residents pay no penalty); (click here for further details); and
  3. Delinquent Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (FBAR) and delinquent international information return submission procedures.

Tax professionals must be familiar with each of these options to effectively advise taxpayers of the compliance solution that best fits the particular facts and circumstances of the case.

OVDP and/or the SDOP allow no u-turn. Once a taxpayer makes a submission under the streamlined program, the taxpayer may not participate in the OVDP.  A taxpayer who submits an OVDP voluntary disclosure letter on or after July 1, 2014, is not eligible to participate in the streamlined program. To avoid creating a bigger problem, taxpayers should very carefully choose their compliance solution with the advice of competent experienced tax legal counsel.

First Indictment for FATCA Violation Announced

Federal prosecutors charged six men Tuesday with running a complicated offshore scheme that allegedly enabled clients to manipulate stocks, avoid U.S. taxes and launder hundreds of millions of dollars.  An indictment unsealed in federal court in Brooklyn alleged the men laundered some $500 million in proceeds from fraudulent securities transactions for more than 100 U.S. citizens and helped commit tax fraud.

The FBI issued a statement announcing the indictment.  U.S. authorities claim, between January 2009 and September 2014, the men masqueraded as financial professionals and developed three interrelated schemes on behalf of themselves and their clients. Authorities claim they:

  • Defrauded legitimate investors in several U.S. stocks by manipulating prices.
  • Helped their own corrupt clients to evade paying U.S. taxes on those bogus profits.
  • Laundered approximately $500 million US in criminal proceeds.

“The investigation of offshore tax evasion and money laundering are top priorities for IRS-Criminal Investigation, and we are committed to using all of our enforcement tools to stop this abuse. The enactment of the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) is yet another example of how it is becoming more and more risky for U.S. taxpayers to hide their money globally. Moreover, this partnership of IRS-CI, the FBI, HSI, and the U.S. Attorney’s Office demonstrates the government’s resolve to combat international crime,” stated IRS Acting Special Agent-in-Charge Shantelle P. Kitchen.

The indictment is the first time a FATCA violation has been charged as an “overt act” in furtherance of a tax conspiracy and securities fraud and strikes a cautionary note for financial institutions and financial service providers that may be used as instrumentalities of crime.  The indictment alleges that the defendants, operating in Belize and Panama, engaged in a conspiracy to: (1) defraud investors in US publicly traded companies by manipulating the price of microcap or “penny” stocks, (2) help their clients avoid US taxation, including by completing false Forms W-8BEN, and (3) launder the proceeds of the fraudulent securities transactions.

The scheme in the Bandfield indictment follows the same path of prior offshore financial frauds, but the prosecutors’ focus on the defendants’ alleged attempt to avoid FATCA compliance, coming only two months after the complex statute’s implementation and a full six months before the initial FATCA reporting deadline, sends a strong message of aggressive FATCA global enforcement. Over 100 countries have now signed or consented to sign FATCA compliance agreements and thousands of foreign banks have registered under FATCA.  FATCA violations may now be used as indicia of fraud. The indictment confirms the coordinated and aggressive tactics US law enforcement is now employing to investigate and prosecute offshore financial fraud.  This may the first time in history that a FATCA violation is be used to prosecute an individual.  More are expected.

Watch Out for Letters From Your Foreign Bank Requesting Information On Your U.S. Residency

Numerous foreign banks are sending letters to their customers demanding personal information to ascertain whether the customer is a U.S. citizen or a U.S. resident. The foreign banks typically state they are required to obtain such personal information pursuant to the U.S. Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (“FATCA”)

FATCA requires that foreign banks submit information to the United States government on all U.S. customers. Banks that do not cooperate are penalized with a 30 percent withholding tax. FATCA applies to nearly every foreign bank and nearly all foreign banks have already registered the United States government to share their U.S. customer.  Some examples of foreign banks’ FATCA compliance include: Scotia Bank, Deutsche Bank, Bank of China, and thousands of other banks abroad.

The bank letters generally inform the customer that the account information may be disclosed to the IRS as necessary under FATCA and advising the customer to discuss their situation with a U.S. tax professional to ensure they are compliant with U.S. reporting obligations related to the foreign account.

All account holders should beware these new bank letters.  The letters are a warning that U.S. persons are required to report all their foreign income and foreign bank accounts and assets (via the FBAR form). This letter may be your only warning before an IRS investigation takes place. Once the U.S government starts an investigation, the U.S. taxpayer will blocked from existing compliance programs and may have to pay a large penalty or face criminal prosecution.

We often recommend that U.S. taxpayers with undisclosed overseas accounts enter into the IRS’s new Streamlined Program (SDOP or SFOP) or Offshore Voluntary Disclosure program (OVDP).  If a person has an undeclared overseas account at a foreign bank and has received a letter from their foreign bank they should retain a qualified tax attorney and come into tax compliance immediately.

New IRS internal procedure guidance for Streamline Filing Compliance Procedures

The IRS has published new IRS internal procedure guidance with IRM changes dated 8/13/14.  The guidance is numbered WI-21-0814-1244 and titled “Streamline Filing Compliance Procedures for Accounts Management International IMF”.  The guidance is here.

The general legal rule is that IRM provisions are for the IRS’s internal guidance and confer no rights on the taxpayer.

There are a few interesting observations:

–       The IRS must determine if the certification is complete — a table checklist is provided in paragraph 7. One item they specifically check for is an open examination. (See par. 8, table).

–       “To complete adjustments on Form 1040X filed under the SDO:  

6. After making the assessment, refer any case with 5 or more foreign information returns (Forms 3520, 3520-A, 5471, 5472, 8938, 926, or 8621) by e-mailing the CIS ID number to “*LB&I OVDP Compliance” with an explanation that the case is being forwarded due to 5 or more foreign information returns. Enter CIS notes indicating the case was referred to *LB&I OVDP Compliance “5 or more foreign income statements”  

NOTE: The total of 5 forms is a combination of all years filed. For example submissions containing 3 Forms 5471 for 2011 and 3 Forms 5471 for 2012 would be referred since the total is 6. Submissions with a combination totaling less than 5 would not be referred.”

–       The above appears to sidetrack filings with 5 or more foreign information returns (Forms 3520, 3520-A, 5471, 5472, 8938, 926, or 8621). Therefore, taxpayers in such situation should be careful of the increased scrutiny.

Persuasive advocacy is required to affirmatively and persuasively demonstrate credible legal grounds for non-willfulness. Do not disclose too much and beware of badges (evidence) of willfulness, blind willfulness, concealment, etc.  For more information see new IRM published. It is very likely that the IRS will carefully monitor taxpayer filings with large accounts making fraudulent claims in the streamlined program and seek to punish them severely to send a warning.  We have already started receiving follow up inquires from the IRS for some of our streamlined program filers.

 

The streamlined program offers a good option for many taxpayers with undeclared accounts. Our firm presented an informational webinar on the Streamlined Filing Compliance Procedures. Materials from the webinar can be downloaded here: Game Changer Streamline.

Streamlined Procedures for U.S. Taxpayers Residing In the United States

Many of our clients are interested in the new Streamlined Filing Compliance Procedures, which were recently announced by the IRS. Therefore, we are providing more general information on the Procedures.

General Eligibility: The modified Streamlined Filing Compliance Procedures are designed for only individual taxpayers, including estates of individual taxpayers. The streamlined procedures are available to both U.S. individual taxpayers residing outside of the United States and U.S. individual taxpayers residing in the United States.

Taxpayers using either the Streamlined Foreign Offshore Procedures or the Streamlined Domestic Offshore Procedures will be required to certify that the failure to report all income, pay all tax and submit all required information returns, including FBARs, was due to non-willful conduct.

If the IRS has initiated a criminal investigation or a civil examination of a taxpayer’s returns, the taxpayer will not be eligible to use these procedures.

Taxpayers who have made “quiet disclosures” may still use the Streamlined Filing Compliance Procedures. However, any penalty assessments previously made with respect to those filings will not be abated.

Eligibility. In addition to having to meet the general eligibility criteria described above, individual U.S. taxpayers, or estates of individual U.S. taxpayers, seeking to use the Streamlined Domestic Offshore Procedures must:

  1. fail to meet the applicable non-residency requirement described above (for joint return filers, one or both of the spouses must fail to meet the applicable non-residency requirement);
  2. have previously filed a U.S. tax return (if required) for each of the most recent three years for which the U.S. tax return due date (or properly applied for extended due date) has passed;
  3. have failed to report gross income from a foreign financial asset and pay tax as required by U.S. law, and may have failed to file an FBAR and/or one or more international information returns with respect to the foreign financial asset; and
  4. such failures resulted from non-willful conduct.

Comment: It appears that the Domestic Streamlined Program is not available to non-filers.

Scope and Effect of Domestic Streamlined Procedures. U.S. taxpayers (U.S. citizens, lawful permanent residents and those meeting the “substantial presence” test) eligible to use the Streamlined Domestic Offshore Procedures must:

  1. for each of the most recent three years for which the U.S. tax return due date (or properly applied for extended due date) has passed (the “covered tax return period”), file amended tax returns, together with all required information returns;
  2. for each of the most recent six years for which the FBAR due date has passed (the “covered FBAR period”), file any delinquent FBARs;
  3. pay a miscellaneous offshore penalty;
  4. pay the full amount of the tax, interest and miscellaneous offshore penalty due in connection with these filings at the time the foregoing returns and FBAR are filed; and
  5. complete and sign a statement on the Certification by U.S. Person Residing in the U.S., certifying:
    (a) that the taxpayer is eligible for the Streamlined Domestic Offshore Procedures;
    (b) that all required FBARs have now been filed;
    (c) that the failure to report all income, pay all tax and submit all required information returns, including FBARs, resulted from non-willful conduct; and
    (d) that the miscellaneous offshore penalty amount is accurate.

It is important to note that a taxpayer may not file delinquent income tax returns (including Form 1040, U.S. Individual Income Tax Return) using these procedures.

The Miscellaneous Offshore Penalty is equal to 5 percent of the highest aggregate balance/value of the taxpayer’s foreign financial assets that are subject to the miscellaneous offshore penalty during the years in the covered tax return period and the covered FBAR period.

A foreign financial asset is subject to the 5-percent miscellaneous offshore penalty if:

  1. the asset should have been, but was not, reported on an FBAR for that year;
  2. the asset should have been, but was not, reported on a Form 8938 for that year; and
  3. the asset was properly reported for that year, but gross income in respect of the asset was not reported in that year.

It appears that rental property, business interests, and other income-generating assets that are not required to be reported on FBAR or Form 8938 are not subject to the 5% penalty.  This is a major difference from OVDp treatment of the same assets.

A participating taxpayer will be subject only to the 5-percent miscellaneous offshore penalty and will not be subject to accuracy-related penalties, information return penalties or FBAR penalties. Even if returns properly filed under these procedures are subsequently selected for audit, no such penalties will be imposed unless the examination results in a determination that the original return was fraudulent and/or that the FBAR violation was willful. Any previously assessed penalties with respect to those years, however, will not be abated.

For returns filed under these procedures, retroactive relief will be provided for failure to timely elect income deferral on certain retirement and savings plans where deferral is permitted by the applicable treaty.

IRS Official Provides Insights for the new IRS Streamlined Compliance Procedures

Taxpayers who are in the Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program to report their overseas assets can request the favorable penalty structure under newly expanded streamlined compliance procedures without giving up the audit and criminal liability protection offered by the OVDP, according to Jennifer Best, senior adviser to the IRS deputy commissioner (International).

The IRS June 18 announced it was expanding its streamlined procedures so both U.S. and non-U.S. residents who certify their tax noncompliance was non-willful can qualify for 5% or zero penalties.

At the same time, the IRS said it was making the OVDP—generally designed for taxpayers with willful failure to report their offshore assets—tougher by requiring disclosure of more information and payment of the 27.5 percent penalty up front.

In addition, the penalty will rise to 50 percent after Aug. 4 for taxpayers whose banks or facilitators of their offshore arrangements are publicly identified by the Justice Department as under investigation.

Best said taxpayers need to be very careful in asserting their conduct was non-willful through the streamlined procedures, noting that information from IRS offshore enforcement initiatives is pouring in. The government carries the burden of proving willfulness into the courtroom where “willfulness” has generally required demonstrating that the government prove the taxpayer’s actions were as a result of a “voluntary, conscious and intentional” act by the taxpayer. Taxpayers considering the streamlined procedures should carefully review the recent court decisions in United States v. Williams, No. 10-2230 (4th Cir. 2012) and United States v. McBride, No. 2:09-cv-00378 (D. Utah 2012) on the issue of determining “willfulness” for assertion of the more significant “willfulFBAR penalties (of up to 50% of the account balance, per year).

Additional considerations regarding someone being “non-willful” often include whether the existence of the account was disclosed to the return preparer or others; whether the account was at some point moved to another foreign financial institution; whether the taxpayer’s advisors had some degree of knowledge about the account; the perceived degree of financial and business sophistication and education of the taxpayer; whether foreign entities were involved as accountholders; documents provided to open the account [i.e. U.S. or foreign passport(s), identification card, etc.]; communications, if any, with others that occurred regarding bank secrecy, taxation, and/or disclosure of any foreign accounts; failure to seek independent legal advice about how to properly handle the foreign bank account and instructions or advice received regarding holding or receiving mail from the bank, etc. Further questions often lay within the responses to each of the foregoing questions.

Best said if taxpayers at the beginning of the process have already submitted their voluntary disclosure intake letters but decide they would rather apply for relief through the streamlined compliance procedures outside of the OVDP, they can do so, but should correspond with the IRS to let the government know they have changed their minds.

Best stressed that if taxpayers stay in the OVDP, they can still request the penalty structure of the streamlined program if they believe their conduct wasn’t willful.  While the transitional treatment may not be quite as favorable as the Streamlined Procedures, it is still better than the alternative, which is paying the full 27.5% or other applicable amount pursuant to the 2012 OVDI rules. While the offshore penalty under the transitional rules is reduced to the same 5% as the streamlined program, the transitional rules make no mention of the other penalties associated with OVDI.  Therefore, under the transitional rules, taxpayers are still liable for the 20% substantial understatement penalty, as well as any applicable failure to file and/or failure to pay penalties associated with your delinquent filings.

Best said even if taxpayers are denied the streamlined penalty, they will remain in the OVDP “at all times” and will still qualify for the 27.5 percent penalty and the protection from criminal prosecution.  Therefore, there seems to be little to lose to seek streamlined treatment.

Best said taxpayers who are in the OVDP and have decided to “opt out” of the process that would result in a closing agreement can request the lighter streamlined penalty as long as they haven’t received formal notice that the IRS is opening an audit.

Best counseled caution in certifications that conduct was non-willful. Best said the IRS will be cross-checking certifications against information that it gets in through treaty requests, John Doe summonses, and other government enforcement activities. “We’re still finalizing our plans of how we’re going to review these, but we’ll be balancing and cross-checking data that we get from all sources,” Best said. “We want to ensure the certifications that we’re getting are accurate and complete.”

Speaking at a separate event in New York on June 20, Best said it is possible that the IRS could go back and re-evaluate willfulness certifications if the client’s bank, through treaty requests or other means, produces account records or other information indicating the client was willfully keeping the account secret.

While the streamlined program offers a welcome option for many taxpayers with undeclared accounts, other ways to address past noncompliance remain viable, including the OVDP program and Delinquent FBAR Submission Procedures and Delinquent International Information Return Submission Procedures.

Our firm presented an informational webinar on the Streamlined Filing Compliance Procedures. Materials from the webinar can be downloaded here: Game Changer Streamline.

How to Demonstrate Non-Willfulness Under The Streamlined Filing Compliance Procedures

The IRS recently announced Streamlined Filing Compliance Procedures in an effort to encourage U.S. taxpayers to come into compliance with their reporting and filing requirements associated with varying interests in foreign financial accounts and assets. The streamlined procedures require the filing of original or amended tax returns reporting whatever foreign source income was generated in each of the applicable tax years as well as properly report any U.S. source income and deductions for each of the applicable tax years.

For eligible U.S. taxpayers residing outside the United States, all penalties will be waived under the streamlined procedures. For eligible U.S. taxpayers residing in the United States, the only penalty under the streamlined procedures will be a miscellaneous offshore penalty equal to 5 percent of the foreign financial assets that gave rise to the tax compliance issue. All income tax related penalties associated with the non-U.S. source income will be waived

The streamlined procedures do not provide protection from a possible criminal prosecution referral. Also taxpayers pursuing resolution of a foreign account issue within the streamlined procedures are required to certify under penalties of perjury that their conduct was “non-willful.” For purposes of the streamlined procedures, non-willful conduct is defined as conduct that is due to negligence, inadvertence, or mistake or conduct that is the result of a good faith misunderstanding of the requirements of the law.

The certification requires that the taxpayer “provide specific reasons for your failure to report all income, pay all tax, and submit all required information returns, including FBARs.

People who are considering opting for the more lenient, streamlined program must be aware of the meaning of “willful” in tax law. Those who sign the statement in error are at risk of severe penalties and criminal prosecution. The IRS has stated that “willfulness is determined by the facts and circumstances of each case,” and that it will depend on tax professionals “to help taxpayers get the right answer in individual cases.”

Evidence of willfulness often includes the following: having an account in a country with bank secrecy rules; holding the account in a trust, foundation or other entity typically used to conceal ownership; moving the account from a firm under U.S. pressure to another, presumably to avoid disclosure; making large cash withdrawals; instructing a firm not to mail statements to the U.S., or communicating in code with it; or having secret meetings with advisers or account representatives. The amount of money is also important: the larger the asset value, the less likely it is nonwillful.

Evidence of nonwillful behavior could include having a small account, especially in comparison to the taxpayer’s other assets; an account on which no U.S. tax is due; a foreign government-sponsored savings or pension account; minimal or no withdrawals; and no prior U.S. tax filings.

There is no perfect fact pattern or objective test for non-willful conduct.  The IRS certification requires a signed sworn statement that “[the taxpayer’s] non-willful conduct is conduct that is due to negligence, inadvertence, or mistake or conduct that is the result of a good faith misunderstanding of the requirements of the law.”  Furthermore the taxpayer must “provide specific reasons for your failure to report all income, pay all tax, and submit all required information returns, including FBARs. If you relied on a professional advisor, provide the name, address, and telephone number of the advisor and a summary of the advice. If married taxpayers submitting a joint certification have different reasons, provide the individual reasons for each spouse separately in the statement of facts.”  See the “non-willful” certification statement available at http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-utl/CertUSResidents.pdf.   

Persuasive advocacy is required to affirmatively and persuasively demonstrate credible legal grounds for non-willfulness. Do not disclose too much and beware of badges (evidence) of willfulness, blind willfulness, concealment, etc. For more information see IRS IRM 4.26.16.4.5.  It is likely that the IRS will carefully monitor taxpayer filings with large accounts making fraudulent claims in the streamlined program and seek to punish them severely to send a warning.

While the streamlined program offers a welcome option for many taxpayers with undeclared accounts, other ways to address past noncompliance remain viable, including the OVDP program and Delinquent FBAR Submission Procedures and Delinquent International Information Return Submission Procedures.

Taxpayer’s Beware: Proving Non-Willful Conduct in the new IRS Streamlined Filing Compliance Procedures

Taxpayers should think carefully before entering a new Internal Revenue Service program titled Streamlined Filing Compliance Procedures for offshore-account holders whose conduct was not “willful”. On June 18th, the IRS announced significant changes to its limited-amnesty programs for U.S. taxpayers holding undeclared offshore accounts abroad. These offshore-account holders now can opt for a new “streamlined procedure.” Participants must file three years of back tax returns and six years of Foreign Bank Account Reports. Participants must also sign a statement certifying that their previous mistakes were “due to non-willful conduct.”

Under this new option, there is a 5% penalty on the balance of the undisclosed account for taxpayers living in the U.S.—and none at all for taxpayers living elsewhere.

Taxpayers in the IRS’s Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program—for those who intentionally hid money abroad—must pay a much higher penalty: 27.5% of the account’s peak balance. Interest, other penalties and advisers’ fees can raise the total cost to about 50% of the account’s value.

People who are considering opting for the more lenient, streamlined program to be aware of the meaning of “willful” in tax law. Those who sign the statement in error are at risk of severe penalties and criminal prosecution. The IRS has stated that “willfulness is determined by the facts and circumstances of each case,” and that it will depend on tax professionals “to help taxpayers get the right answer in individual cases.”

Evidence of willfulness often includes the following: having an account in a country with bank secrecy rules; holding the account in a trust, foundation or other entity typically used to conceal ownership; moving the account from a firm under U.S. pressure to another, presumably to avoid disclosure; making large cash withdrawals; instructing a firm not to mail statements to the U.S., or communicating in code with it; or having secret meetings with advisers or account representatives. The amount of money is also important: the larger the asset value, the less likely it is nonwillful.

Evidence of nonwillful behavior could include having a small account, especially in comparison to the taxpayer’s other assets; an account on which no U.S. tax is due; a foreign government-sponsored savings or pension account; minimal or no withdrawals; and no prior U.S. tax filings.

There is no perfect fact pattern or objective test for non-willful conduct.  The IRS certification requires a signed sworn statement that “[the taxpayer’s] non-willful conduct is conduct that is due to negligence, inadvertence, or mistake or conduct that is the result of a good faith misunderstanding of the requirements of the law.”  Furthermore the taxpayer must “provide specific reasons for your failure to report all income, pay all tax, and submit all required information returns, including FBARs. If you relied on a professional advisor, provide the name, address, and telephone number of the advisor and a summary of the advice. If married taxpayers submitting a joint certification have different reasons, provide the individual reasons for each spouse separately in the statement of facts.”  See the “non-willful” certification statement available at http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-utl/CertUSResidents.pdf.   Advocacy is required to affirmatively and persuasively demonstrate legal grounds for non-willfulness.  Do not disclose too much and beware of badges (evidence) of willfulness, blind willfulness, concealment, etc. For more information see IRS IRM 4.26.16.4.5.

It is likely that the IRS will carefully monitor taxpayer filings with large accounts making fraudulent claims in the streamlined program and punish them severely to send a warning.

While the streamlined program offers a welcome option for many taxpayers with undeclared accounts, other ways to address past noncompliance remain viable, including the OVDP program and Delinquent FBAR Submission Procedures and Delinquent International Information Return Submission Procedures.

Our firm presented an informational webinar on the Streamlined Filing Compliance Procedures. Materials from the webinar can be downloaded here: Game Changer Streamline.

IRS announces new Streamlined Filing Compliance Procedures

The IRS announced substantial changes to both the Streamlined Filing Compliance Procedures for Non-Resident, Non-Filer Taxpayers and the Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program (OVDP) on June 18, 2014.  Effective July 1, 2014, the IRS is making it easier for individuals to qualify for the new Streamlined Procedures. Taxpayers may now qualify under two scenarios:

1. U.S. citizens or permanent residents who reside outside the U.S. ($0 penalty)

Streamlined procedures for U.S. residents are referred to as the Streamlined Domestic Offshore Procedures (SDOP).  This program is for U.S. citizens or permanent residents who have physically lived outside the U.S. for at least 330 full days for any one or more of the most recent three years. These taxpayers will qualify for the $0 penalty as long as these failures resulted from non-willful conduct. SDOP description and submission instructions are available at http://www.irs.gov/Individuals/International-Taxpayers/U-S-Taxpayers-Residing-in-the-United-States. Persons residing in the United States applying for the new streamlined procedures must complete and submit the “non-willful” certification statement available athttp://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-utl/CertUSResidents.pdf. 

Advocacy is required to affirmatively and persuasively demonstrate legal grounds for non-willfulness.  Do not disclose too much and beware of badges (evidence) of willfulness, blind willfulness, concealment, etc. For more information see IRS IRM 4.26.16.4.5.

2. U.S. citizens or permanent residents who reside in the U.S. (5 percent penalty)

Streamlined procedures for non-residents are referred to as the Streamlined Foreign Offshore Procedures (SFOP). These taxpayers will qualify for a 5 percent penalty as long as they have filed U.S. tax returns for the previous years and their failures to properly report income on their tax returns, or foreign accounts on their FBARs, resulted from non-willful conduct.

Persons residing outside the United States applying for the new streamlined procedures must complete and submit the “non-willful” certification statement available at http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-utl/CertNonResidents.pdf.  Advocacy is required to affirmatively and persuasively demonstrate legal grounds for non-willfulness.  Do not disclose too much and beware of badges (evidence) of willfulness, blind willfulness, concealment, etc. For more information see IRS IRM 4.26.16.4.5.

 

Taxpayers in either Streamlined Program only need to file the most recent 3 years of tax returns (e.g., 2011, 2012 and 2013) and 6 years of delinquent FBARs (e.g., 2008-2013).

How to Choose?

Taxpayers who have already entered the 2012 OVDP may be eligible for transitional treatment from the 2012 OVDP. This would effectively apply the $0 or 5 percent penalty to their disclosure. Taxpayers who have not yet entered the 2012 OVDP, or who have only pre-cleared to enter the 2012 OVDP, may proceed directly through one of the 2014 Streamlined Programs.

Still Ineligible for the New Streamlined Procedures?

Taxpayers who do not qualify for one of the new Streamlined Procedures, but still qualify for the 2014 OVDP, face a one-time 27.5 percent offshore penalty based on the highest balance year unless the taxpayer has an undisclosed account at a bank listed on the IRS posted list – then it is a 50 percent penalty starting July 1, 2014. Taxpayers in the OVDP must file 8 years of income tax returns (or amended returns) and 8 years of FBARs.

Taxpayers must choose one or the other: either enter the 2014 OVDP or enter the 2014 Streamlined Programs. If rejected from the 2014 Streamlined Programs, taxpayers may not later enter the 2014 OVDP Program. Moreover the 2014 Streamlined Programs do not come with the guarantee that the IRS will not recommend criminal prosecution if rejected.

Determine Your Next Step in Light of These New IRS Changes

This alert discusses only some of the many changes made by the IRS. It is important to note that the IRS has the authority to change the terms (qualifications, penalties, etc.) whenever it chooses. Moreover, in certain situations the IRS is permitting taxpayers already in the OVDP to either adopt the rules of the new OVDP or convert their disclosure to one of the two more lenient streamlined programs – as long as the taxpayer has not yet signed the final Form 906 closing letter that is received at the conclusion of a taxpayer’s disclosure.

Anyone affected by the Streamlined Filing Compliance Procedures and the Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program should have their individual situation carefully reviewed to determine the most advantageous route in light of these new rules.

As FATCA continues to go fully online, the cost and risk of doing nothing seems to have gone up significantly. In summary, taxpayers with undisclosed offshore accounts  should fully explore some form of voluntary disclosure before it is too late and much more costly.  Our law firm can assist in determining the IRS filing needs as well as any other international legal planning.

Our firm presented a informational webinar on the Streamlined Filing Compliance Procedures and the Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program. Materials from the webinar can be downloaded here: Game Changer Streamline.